Exploring the role of oxidative stress and the effect of N-acetylcysteine in thiopurine-induced liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease: A randomized crossover pilot study.

Thiopurine treatment is regularly complicated by drug-induced liver injury. It has been suggested that oxidative stress may play a synergistic role. To assess whether thiopurine-induced liver injury coincides with increased oxidative stress and whether co-administration with N-acetylcysteine is protective, we performed a randomized open label crossover pilot study in inflammatory bowel disease patients with thiopurine-induced increased serum liver tests. The study comprised four stages of 4 weeks. Patients received no additional therapy followed by N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg twice a day, or the other way around, alongside ongoing thiopurine treatment. The third and fourth stages comprised a washout period and thiopurine reintroduction period. Nine patients completed the study, and the addition of N-acetylcysteine decreased myeloperoxidase concentrations (33.6-24.5 pmol/L, p = 0.038). The other biomarkers remained unchanged, including thiopurine metabolites, xanthine oxidase activity, thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and serum liver enzyme activity tests. Reintroduction of thiopurines led to an increase of F2-isoprostanes (101-157 ng/mmol, p = 0.038), but not of serum liver enzyme activity tests. Results suggests that thiopurines may increase oxidative stress and although the addition of N-acetylcysteine led to a decrease in plasma myeloperoxidase concentrations, it does not protect from thiopurine-induced increase of serum liver tests.

The continuous rediscovery and the benefit-risk ratio of thioguanine, a comprehensive review.

Introduction: In the 1950s, thioguanine (TG), a thiopurine-derivative together with azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP), were developed for the treatment of childhood leukemia. Over the years, the use of TG was also explored for other, mainly immune-mediated and inflammatory, diseases such as in the field of dermatology and rheumatology (e.g. psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)) and gastroenterology and hepatology (e.g. inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), autoimmune hepatitis).Areas covered: This review provides a comprehensive overview of all the clinical uses of TG and describes its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and toxicity.Expert opinion: Thioguanine has shown beneficial clinical effects in hematological (particularly leukemia) and several immune-inflammatory diseases including psoriasis, SLE, polycythemia vera, Churg-Strauss syndrome, IBD, collagenous sprue, refractory celiac disease, and autoimmune hepatitis. Thioguanine is not effective in treating solid-cancers. At relatively low dosages, i.e. 0.2- 0.3mg/kg/day or 20 mg/day, TG has a favorable risk-benefit ratio and is a safe and effective drug in the long-term treatment of amongst other IBD patients. Thioguanine toxicity, especially myelotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity, including nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver, is limited when dosed adequately. The occurrence of NRH appears dose-dependent and has been especially described during high dose TG above 40 mg/day.

Sustained effectiveness, safety and therapeutic drug monitoring of tioguanine in a cohort of 274 IBD patients intolerant for conventional therapies.

BACKGROUND: Tioguanine (or thioguanine) is an alternative drug for IBD patients who fail prior conventional immunomodulating therapy. AIM: To report effectiveness, safety and therapeutic drug monitoring in a cohort of patients with prolonged tioguanine maintenance therapy. METHODS: In this nationwide, multicentre study, medical records of tioguanine- using IBD patients were retrospectively reviewed. Response to therapy was defined as clinical effectiveness without (re)initiation of corticosteroids, concurrent biological therapy or surgical intervention. All adverse events that occurred during the follow-up were listed and graded according to the common terminology criteria (CTC). RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients (female 63%, Crohn's disease in 68%) were included with median treatment duration of 51 months, 1567 patient-years of follow-up and median 20 mg/d tioguanine dosage. Tioguanine was tolerated in 79%, clinical effectiveness at 6 months was documented in 66% and sustained clinical effectiveness during 12 months in 51% of patients. Forty-one per cent of patients developed adverse events: 5% were graded as severe. Adverse events comprised infection requiring hospitalisation in three and skin cancer in eight patients (two melanomas). Asymptomatic nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver occurred in two out of 52 patients with liver biopsies (3.8%) and portal hypertension in three whereof one potentially associated with tioguanine (0.4%). Clinical effectiveness was correlated with 6-thioguanine nucleotide threshold concentrations >682 pmol/8×108 RBC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term tioguanine therapy for at least 12 months was effective in 51% and well tolerated as a maintenance treatment for IBD in about 70% of patients. Adverse events were common, but mainly mild or moderate. 6-Thioguanine nucleotide threshold concentration ≥ 700 pmol/8×108 RBC is proposed as target level with higher odds for clinical effectiveness.

Key insights from therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn's disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease are increasing causing a significant disease burden. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advocated as a promising tool for personalized or individual-tailored therapy strategies and has been welcomed as a new means to improve current therapy strategies. Nevertheless, pharmacokinetic-based TDM has limitations, and straightforward target concentrations for most therapies are lacking. Areas covered: In the following concise review of literature, key insights of TDM in thiopurine, methotrexate, anti-TNF, vedolizumab and ustekinumab therapy for Crohn's disease are being described. Expert opinion: Therapeutic drug monitoring may, up till now, be helpful to adjust thiopurine and infliximab therapy, primarily in a reactive setting, in case of inefficacy and of occurrence of adverse event. With this restricted application, the goal of individualized therapy based on TDM has not yet been achieved.

High inter-individual variability of serum xanthine oxidoreductase activity in IBD patients.

OBJECTIVES: Thiopurines play an essential role in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD, i.e. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). Over the past decade, several strategies to optimize treatment with thiopurines have been evaluated, including co-administration of allopurinol, a xanthine-oxidoreductase (XO) inhibitor, to low-dose thiopurine therapy. We aimed to assess the inter-individual variability of XO-activity between IBD-patients. METHODS: We assessed XO activity in serum of IBD-patients of two medical centers in The Netherlands using the Amplex® Red Xanthine/Xanthine Oxidase Assay Kit, which measures the superoxide formation in a coupled reaction to the red-fluorescent oxidation product, resofurine. RESULTS: We observed a high inter-individual variability of XO-activity in 119 patients, with a median activity of 16 µU/ml/hour (range 1-85 µU/ml/hour). The XO-activity was influenced by gender (male 19.5 vs. female 14.0 µU/ml/hour, p < 0.01), patient's age (Pearson's correlation r = 0.21, p = 0.02) and duration of IBD (r = 0.23, p = 0.01). The XO activity was not affected by the type of IBD, smoking status, body mass index or (type of) thiopurine use (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high inter-individual variability of XO-activity in IBD-patients; XO-activity is positively associated with male gender and patient's age.

Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among 2 Real-life Intercept Cohorts: Effect of Allopurinol Comedication?

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are frequently used immunosuppressive drugs to maintain remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Half of the conventional thiopurine-derivative users have to discontinue treatment within 5 years, mainly because of intolerable adverse events. Over recent years, different strategies to optimize thiopurine treatment were suggested, yet, studies describing the clinical effectiveness of these strategies remain scarce. The aims of this study were to compare tolerability and sustained clinical benefit of conventional thiopurine derivatives therapy among two 5-year real-life intercept cohorts and to assess the clinical value of specifically allopurinol cotherapy. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed data from patients in whom weight-based thiopurine monotherapy was initiated between 2005 and 2009 (cohort 1) or between 2010 and 2014 (cohort 2). The initiation of the second cohort was synchronic to the start of allopurinol-based optimization in our center. Optimization strategies were extracted from patient charts. RESULTS: In total, 105 patients were included (60 in cohort 1, and 45 in cohort 2). Metabolite measurement was performed in 37% versus 84% of the patients (P < 0.001). Subsequent optimization strategies were applied in 33% versus 58% of the patients because of inadequate metabolite concentrations, intolerance, or ineffectiveness (P = 0.01). Allopurinol was coadministered to therapy in 18 patients (40%) in the second cohort. Therapy was switched to thioguanine in 11 versus 6 patients (P > 0.05). Overall, total duration was longer in the second cohort (10.8 versus 34.1 months, P < 0.001). The number of ongoing thiopurine users (20% versus 49%) and sustained clinical benefit (13% versus 38%) were higher in the second cohort (both P < 0.05). This was mainly because of a decrease in hepatotoxicity after optimization (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of thiopurine therapy by the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with subsequent administration of allopurinol cotherapy successfully enhanced sustained clinical benefit and tolerability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver in Patients with IBD Treated with Allopurinol-Thiopurine Combination Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine therapy, particularly thioguanine, has been associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver. Combination therapy of allopurinol and an adapted low-dose thiopurine leads to a pharmacokinetic profile that has similarities to that of thioguanine. Therefore, allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy may also be associated with NRH of the liver. We assessed the prevalence of NRH in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy by liver biopsy specimen examination. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a Dutch IBD-referral center. Adult patients with IBD, treated for at least 1 year with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy were eligible. All patients underwent a liver biopsy, after standard laboratory and thiopurine metabolite concentration assessments. Histopathology was assessed by an experienced liver pathologist. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with IBD were included. The mean duration of combination therapy at the time of the liver biopsy was 24.7 months (SD 5.7). NRH was observed in one of the biopsies (4.8%), any grade of nodularity was observed in 3 biopsy specimens (14%). Other findings included phlebosclerosis (24%), perisinusoidal fibrosis (81%), sinusoidal dilatation (43%), perivenular fibrosis (14%), and periportal fibrosis (29%). Around the time of biopsy, the median 6-thioguanine nucleotide and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide concentrations were 705 pmol × 10 red blood cells (RBC) (interquartile range 498-915) and 355 pmol × 10 RBC (interquartile range 225-670). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of histologically assessed NRH in patients with IBD, who were treated with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy, was 5%. This percentage is in line with thiopurine-naive and thioguanine-using patients with IBD. None of the included patients had clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of (noncirrhotic) portal hypertension.

Clinical Value of Mercaptopurine After Failing Azathioprine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines have been widely accepted as immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients have to discontinue thiopurines due to intolerance or ineffectiveness. A therapeutically beneficial effect of switching from azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) after developing adverse events (AEs) has been reported. The authors assessed the clinical value of MP therapy after AZA discontinuation due to intolerance and, secondary, due to ineffectiveness. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, the authors analyzed data from patients in whom AZA therapy had failed and who were subsequently treated with MP. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients initiated MP therapy after intolerance to AZA. Intolerance reoccurred in 22 (58%) patients and the remaining 16 (42%) tolerated MP. In 18 out of 48 patients (38%), the AEs that led to discontinuation of MP were similar to those of AZA. A longer duration of prior AZA use was more common in patients who were subsequently tolerant for MP (5.3 versus 1.2 months; P = 0.04). Twenty-two patients discontinued AZA due to ineffectiveness. Eight (36%) patients had clinical benefit from a switch to MP. Six out of these 8 (75%) patients used allopurinol alongside MP, due to ineffectiveness based on a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Patients were more likely to have clinical benefit if the interval between both thiopurines was longer (4.4 versus 0.01 months; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors showed that a noteworthy number of patients benefitted therapeutically from a switch from AZA to MP when failing due to intolerance or ineffectiveness; however, the percentage was lower than previously reported in literature.

Routinely Established Skewed Thiopurine Metabolism Leads to a Strikingly High Rate of Early Therapeutic Failure in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The conventional thiopurines azathioprine and mercaptopurine are considered maintenance immunosuppressive drugs of choice in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unfortunately, treatment is often discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) or refractoriness, retrospectively associated with the high levels of the thiopurine metabolites 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR). Patients with a clinically "skewed" thiopurine metabolism may be particularly at risk for therapy failure. We determined the predictive value of this pharmacological phenomenon in patients with IBD during regular thiopurine therapy. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and tolerability of weight-based thiopurine therapy were determined in all patients with IBD displaying a skewed metabolism [ratio 6-MMPR/6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) >20]. All samples were routinely assessed between 2008 and 2012, as part of standard clinical follow-up after initiation of conventional thiopurine therapy. RESULTS: Forty-one (84%) of 49 included patients with IBD discontinued thiopurines (55% female, 53% with Crohn disease) with a median duration of 14 weeks (range, 7-155). The majority of patients with a skewed metabolism discontinued thiopurines because of adverse events (55%) or refractoriness (12%). The most commonly observed adverse event was hepatotoxicity (18 patients, 37%). Median 6-TGN level was 159 pmol/8 × 10 RBC (range, 46-419), median 6-MMPR level was 11,020 pmol/8 × 10 RBC (range, 3610-43,670), and the median 6-MMPR/6-TGN ratio was 72 (range, 29-367). Thiopurine therapy failure was associated with a ratio above 50 (P < 0.03). Hepatotoxicity occurred more frequently in patients with an extremely skewed metabolism (6-MMPR/6-TGN ratio >100) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a routinely established skewed metabolism is a major risk factor for future thiopurine failure in patients with IBD. These observations imply that routine thiopurine metabolite measurements may be used as a prognostic tool to identify those patients with an aberrant-skewed metabolism at an early stage, possibly benefitting from therapy adjustments.

Sustained clinical benefit and tolerability of methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Methotrexate is an immunosuppressant that is used to treat patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, there are few data on the long-term effects of methotrexate maintenance therapy for these patients. We assessed the sustained clinical benefits and tolerability of methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy in patients with CD. METHODS: We analyzed data from 3 hospitals on 174 consecutive patients with CD (age, 35 ± 12 y) who received methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy (23% also did not respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy) from 2000 to 2010. We assessed patient characteristics and the tolerability and sustained clinical benefits of the treatment. Sustained clinical benefit was defined as ongoing use of methotrexate or intentional discontinuation of successful therapy before the end-of-study point. RESULTS: The number of patients with sustained clinical benefits from methotrexate monotherapy were 98 (86%), 50 (63%), 27 (47%), and 3 (20%), at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Forty-five patients (26%) discontinued methotrexate because of intolerance, particularly within 6 months after therapy began. Adverse responses generally were mild; only 1 patient required admission to the hospital for infection with cytomegalovirus, and no drug-related deaths were reported. Intolerance of the preceding thiopurine therapy was associated with adverse events during methotrexate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort study of patients who received methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy for CD, 47% continued to receive the therapy or intentionally discontinued successful therapy within 2 years, and 20% did so within 5 years. Long-term use of methotrexate was well tolerated and relatively safe.

Safety and effectiveness of long-term allopurinol-thiopurine maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are the mainstay of conventional maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unfortunately, up to 50% of patients discontinue immunosuppressive therapy within 2 years due to intolerance or lack of efficacy. Allopurinol with low-dose thiopurine can optimize thiopurine metabolism for IBD patients with preferential shunting toward 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) formation. The aim of this study was to assess long-term maintenance effectiveness and tolerability of allopurinol-thiopurine therapy in a larger multicenter cohort of IBD patients. METHODS: Enrolled patients who failed monotherapy with thiopurines due to a skewed metabolism were subsequently treated with a combination therapy of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine. Adverse events were monitored and therapeutic adherence was assessed. Seventy-seven IBD patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 19 months. RESULTS: The median 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentration increased from 145 during monotherapy to 271 pmol/8 × 10(8) red blood cell (RBC) after at least 8 weeks of combination therapy while reducing the thiopurine dosage (P < 0.001). In contrast, median 6-MMP concentrations decreased from 10,110 to 265 pmol/8 × 10(8) RBC (P < 0.001). Leukopenia occurred in 12 patients (16%), requiring dose adaptation. Liver test abnormalities normalized in 81% of patients after the addition of allopurinol. Sixteen (21%) patients had to discontinue combination therapy. The percentage of patients still using combination therapy at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months was 87%, 85%, 76%, and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term combination therapy with allopurinol and low-dose thiopurines is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in IBD patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism.

Hepatotoxicity associated with 6-methyl mercaptopurine formation during azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine therapy does not occur on the short-term during 6-thioguanine therapy in IBD treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High concentrations of methylated thiopurine metabolites, such as 6-methyl mercaptopurine, are associated with hepatotoxicity during administration of the conventional thiopurines azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine in IBD patients. Metabolization of the non-conventional thiopurine 6-thioguanine does not generate 6-methyl mercaptopurine. Hence, the aim of our study was to evaluate hepatotoxicity during 6-thioguanine in IBD patients who previously failed conventional thiopurines due to 6-methyl mercaptopurine associated hepatotoxicity. METHODS: A retrospective single center intercept cohort study was performed of IBD patients using 6-thioguanine between January 2006 and July 2010 after failing conventional thiopurine therapy due to 6-methyl mercaptopurine associated hepatotoxicity. The primary outcome was the occurrence of 6-thioguanine induced hepatotoxicity, scaled according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Median duration of 6-thioguanine therapy (median daily dosage 21 mg (9-24)) was 23 weeks (6-96). Hepatotoxicity did not reoccur in 15 out of 19, whereas grade 1 toxicity persisted in 4 patients (p<0.001). Median aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase concentrations decreased from 34 U/l (20-59) and 64 U/l (15-175) to 23 U/l (18-40; p=0.003) and 20 U/l (14-48; p=0.019), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hepatotoxicity does not reoccur during 6-thioguanine treatment in most IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to 6-methyl mercaptopurine associated hepatotoxicity. Hence, at least at short-term, 6-thioguanine appears a justifiable alternative thiopurine for these IBD patients.

Allopurinol enhances the activity of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase in inflammatory bowel disease patients during low-dose thiopurine therapy: preliminary data of an ongoing series.

Thiopurines are crucial in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The phenotype of pivotal metabolic enzymes determines whether thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) are generated in clinically sufficiently high levels. The first step in activation of thiopurine prodrugs to 6-TGN is catalysis by hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT). Often, patients exhibit a clinically unfavorable metabolism, leading to discontinuation of conventional thiopurine therapy. The combination of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine therapy may optimize this variant metabolism, presumably by affecting enzyme activities. We performed a prospective pharmacodynamic study to determine the effect of combination therapy on the activity of HGPRT. The activity of HGPRT and 6-TGN concentrations was measured in red blood cells during thiopurine monotherapy and after 4 weeks of combination therapy. The activity of HGPRT was also measured after 12 weeks of combination therapy. From the results, we conclude that combination therapy increases the activity of HGPRT and subsequently 6-TGN concentrations.